Quantcast
Channel: Eduardo Saverin
Viewing all 56 articles
Browse latest View live

Why More And More Americans Are Abandoning Their US Citizenship

$
0
0

In November, millions of Americans will trudge to their local polling places to cast votes in the hope of improving their lives here in the USA. Between now and then, a few hundred Americans will vote with their feet in the hope of improving their lives outside the USA.

Last year, nearly 1,800 Americans surrendered their citizenship. In a nation of 300 million folks, 1,800 émigrés is hardly a rush for the exits. But the recent trend is, nevertheless, intriguing.

renouncing citizenship

As recently as four years ago, only 200 people checked out of America for good. Back then, surrendering US citizenship would have seemed as unthinkable to most Americans as declining a free vacation to Hawaii to pay for a vacation in Newark. It would have seemed as crazy as:

  • …giving away a brand new Aston Martin Zagato to buy a used Buick Le Sabre.
  • …surrendering your membership at Augusta National in order to start playing Augusta Municipal.
  • …trading away an original Van Gogh painting for an original Peter Max poster
  • …refusing a date with Mila Kunis in order to watch re-runs of her animated counterpart, Meg Griffin, in Family Guy.
  • …abandoning a beachfront mansion to live in your car.

Giving up citizenship would have seemed as incomprehensible as…go ahead, create your own simile.

Bottom line: Surrendering US citizen was absolutely unthinkable. But not anymore. Now it is “thinkable,” albeit still relatively rare. The absolute numbers are still tiny, but the trend conveys a very large message: Discontent is on the rise.

Increasingly, the used LeSabres and Augusta Municipals are winning the contest. And probably not because they are so alluring, but rather because the “Aston Martin” is starting to sputter like a used moped and “Augusta National’s” fairways are starting to sprout more weeds than its deep rough.

To be clear, your California editor remains an American citizen with a valid American passport…and no pending petitions in any American embassies to surrender his citizenship. His observations, therefore, are not personal…but they are heartfelt.

When Americans begin abandoning the “Land of the Free” to seek greater freedom elsewhere, it is time to sit up and pay attention; it is time ask yourself, “Why? Why are they leaving? What’s wrong?”

Is it just a “tax thing” or are other forces in play? Is it because folks don’t like:

  • …drones watching their every move while the mow their lawns or skinny dip in the pool with their spouses.
  • …enduring a political “ethic” that increasingly declares, “What’s yours is mine and, if not, it ought to be”…
  • …suffering financially for behaving responsibly, while Wall Street bankers reap rewards for behaving irresponsibly.
  • …cohabitating with an NSA that builds mega-spy centers in the Utah desert to eavesdrop on their phone calls with Granny or their steamy chat messages with a significant other.
  • …living in a land that increasingly seems to be saying to would-be democracies around the globe: “Do you need a Constitution? Why not take ours? We’re not using it.” [Thanks, Jay Leno].

Who knows the exact reason why 1,800 Americans chose to leave last year — nine times as many as left four years earlier. Certainly, each one of them had their reasons. But like a corporate insider that sells his own stock, there’s one thing you know for certain about his motives: he is not selling because he believes the stock will go up. Maybe he doesn’t believe the stock will go down, but no one sells a stock they believe will go up.

Likewise, Americans who bail on their country may not think things are going to get any worse any time soon, but they clearly do not believe things are going to get better. So far, the pitter-patter of footsteps heading for the exits is barely a murmur…but the murmur is getting louder.

Eric Fry
for The Daily Reckoning

Why More and More Americans are Abandoning Their US Citizenship originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas. Recently Agora Financial released a video titled "What Causes Gas Price to Increase?".

 

Read more posts on The Daily Reckoning »

Please follow Business Insider on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »


Here's The First Slide Deck 'The Facebook' Used To Pitch Ads In 2004 (FB)

$
0
0

Here's an unusual Facebook advertising artifact.

Jack Marshall at Digiday got his hands on the original slides that first Facebook investor, and first CFO, Eduardo Saverin used to pitch Facebook in 2004 to advertisers.

The site was only two months old. It had 70,000 users and was at 20 colleges.

Saverin was pushing IAB standard ad units rather than social ads and "was asking for ad commitments of around $80,000 for targeted display ad placements that would reach 'thousands' of users."

Here's one of the slides, so you can get a taste of Saverin's pitch. You can check out the full deck at Digiday >Facebook ads slide 2004

Please follow Advertising on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Facebook Cofounder Eduardo Saverin Is Turning His Attention To Car Service Startups

$
0
0

eduardo saverin

Eduardo Saverin, most famous for cofounding Facebook before getting booted out by Mark Zuckerberg, now has his sights set on transportation startups.

On Tuesday a Texas-based startup called Silvercar announced it has raised a $14 million Series B round led by Saverin and Velos Partners, the Wall Street Journal reported. Saverin will join Silvercar's board as well.

"We’re seeing sweeping changes in how personal transportation is being packaged and consumed, and Silvercar is doing for car rental what Uber and Lyft did for livery,"Saverin said in a statement to Mashable. "In fact, like Uber, there’s so much potential beyond the first product. I believe that the most exciting things Silvercar will do are yet to come and will be borne out of their consumer-friendly mobile app and powerful technology platform."

Unlike Uber and Lyft, which have been duking it out in price-gauging wars that have left some Uber drivers upset, Silvercar isn't trying to make its rentals cheaper. Instead, Silvercar finances its own fleet of Audi A4s. It's available at eight U.S. airports now, and will be in 10 by the end of the year, according to Techcrunch.

Saverin, who renounced his U.S. citizenship and moved to Singapore two years ago,  also backed a peer-to-peer airport car rental service called FlightCar. He contributed to its $13.5 million Series A round of fundraising earlier in September. 

SEE ALSO: UBER DRIVERS PROTEST: 'You Can't Make A Living Working Only For Uber'

Join the conversation about this story »

Meet the richest tech mogul in 14 major countries around the world

The richest billionaires under 35 and how they got their money

Facebook cofounder Eduardo Saverin is making a bid for a startup that just went bankrupt

$
0
0

eduardo saverin

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Jumio, an online identification verification company whose clients include United Airlines and Airbnb, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for its U.S. business and initiated the sale of assets, according to court documents.

The company, based in Palo Alto, California, said in a court filing on Monday that it has struggled to raise funding for its operations following government investigations into financial irregularities and stock sales by its former management team.

"This has left Jumio with few alternatives," Jumio Chief Executive Stephen Stuut said in the court filing in Delaware. As a result, he said Jumio had decided to sell most of its assets under a Chapter 11 restructuring process.

"Despite some of the challenges Jumio's leadership team inherited, our underlying business remains exceptionally strong," Stuut said.

The company said it has received a stalking-horse bid from Jumio Acquisition LLC, a new entity formed by Facebook cofounder Eduardo Saverin. The bid was valued at about $22.6 million, Jumio said.

The stalking-horse agreement opens the door for other interested parties to make a bid. Jumio said it had received initial interest from 32 potential bidders.

Saverin has also offered $3.7 million in financing to provide liquidity needed to see the company through its bankruptcy proceedings.

Jumio listed assets of between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of up to $50 million in its court filing.

The case is in U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware, No. 16-10682.

(Reporting by Tracy Rucinski; Editing by Matthew Lewis)

SEE ALSO: http://www.businessinsider.com/first-twitter-and-odeo-employees-and-where-they-are-now-2016-3

Join the conversation about this story »

Here's where Facebook's first 20 employees are now (FB)

$
0
0

Early Facebook execs

Who were the people behind Facebook when it was just a startup? And where are they now?

Only two of Facebook's first 20 employees still work at the company — and you can probably guess one of them.

Most left during the social network's early days to work at other tech companies or start their own. Several have become successful investors at large VC firms. Out of Facebook's first 20 employees, only two were women. Many are now absurdly rich, following Facebook's IPO in 2012.

Here's where Facebook's first 20 employees are now:

SEE ALSO: The fabulous life and career of 33-year-old Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg

SEE ALSO: 33 photos of Facebook's rise from a Harvard dorm room to world domination

Dustin Moskovitz, Facebook's first CTO, was Mark Zuckerberg's roommate. The two dropped out of Harvard together to move to California and work on Facebook.

Employed by Facebook: February 2004 - November 2009

Position:Cofounder

Where he is now: He's the cofounder and CEO at enterprise software company Asana. He also cofounded Good Ventures, a philanthropic firm with the mission "to help humanity thrive." He has a net worth of nearly $12 billion, according to Forbes.



Chris Hughes cofounded Facebook and served as the site's first spokesman. He later coordinated all social networking aspects of Obama's 2008 campaign.

Employed by Facebook: February 2004

Position at Facebook:Cofounder

Where he is now: After working on Obama's 2008 campaign, Hughes became executive director of Jumo, a startup that tried to utilize social media to change the world. In 2012, he purchased a majority stake in The New Republic and became its executive chairman and editor-in-chief. He put the magazine up for sale in 2016 after it failed to become profitable.

Hughes is now co-chair of the Economic Security Project, a group that wants to make universal basic income a reality in the U.S.



Eduardo Saverin was a Facebook co-founder and its first CFO. He famously sued Mark Zuckerberg and the two reached a settlement.

Employed by Facebook: February 2004

Position:Cofounder

Where he is now: After winning a legal battle with Facebook which let him retain his cofounder status, Saverin began angel investing in startups like Qwiki and Chris Hughes' Jumo. In 2011, Saverin (who was born in Brazil) renounced his U.S. citizenship and moved to Singapore, likely because of the taxes he'd have to pay following Facebook's public offering.

He says he has no hard feelings when it comes to Facebook or Mark Zuckerberg, who ousted him from the company shortly after its launch. Saverin has a net worth of roughly $8.7 billion, according to Forbes.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

How these 23 entrepreneurs became the lesser known co-founders of the biggest tech companies in the world

$
0
0

Steve Jobs and Bill Gates

When a tech company reaches a certain level of success, the names of the founders often become synonymous with the brand they create. At least, that's the case with founders who are the "face" of the company.

Still, we tend to forget that Steve Jobs, Travis Kalanick, and Bill Gates, didn't create Apple, Uber, and Microsoft alone. 

On the contrary, these companies might not exist in the same capacity if it weren't for the co-founders who fly under the radar because they chose to steer clear of the spotlight, or because the pressures brought on by the early years of a quickly-growing company pushed them away. Many of these same people have moved on to create even more multi-million dollar ideas, while others left for a life of philanthropy, or pursued another passion.

Here are the lesser known co-founders who helped create some of the biggest tech companies you definitely know:

SEE ALSO: RED's $1,200 smartphone is coming this summer — take a look at all its futuristic technologies

Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak

Steve Wozniak (a.k.a. "Woz") doesn't really need an introduction, but for those who aren't well-versed in the history of Apple: Wozniak designed and built the first Apple computer, Apple 1.

He was working at Hewlett-Packard (HP) at the time, where he tried to share his computer design. When he was denied multiple times, Steve Jobs — who was working there for the summer — suggested the pair try to sell a fully-assembled version of the design to a third party. 

As Apple grew, Wozniak felt the emphasis on marketing hindered him as an engineer, and he left for good in 1985, but he's still the sole inventor on multiple Apple patents, including the "Microcomputer for use with video display."

The same year he left Apple, Wozniak finished earning his degree from UC Berkeley (under the fake name "Rocky Raccoon Clark") and founded a company that built the first programmable universal remote control.

Wozniak has since co-founded two more companies, multiple non-profits including the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the Silicon Valley Comic Con convention. He's also on multiple company boards, and remains on the official Apple employee list. He's also an Apple shareholder.



Apple co-founder Ronald Wayne

Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak formed "Apple Computer" in 1976 alongside their administrative supervisor, Ronald Wayne, who was 42 at the time.

Wayne drew up the first logo and the partnership agreement that gave him 10% of the company, but only lasted for 12 days before deciding he couldn't keep up with the pace the company was going.

Wayne sold his shares for $800 — a decision he claims he doesn't regret. Today, he holds dozens of patents but not enough capital to profit from them, and sells gold, rare coins, and stamps from his home in Nevada.



Uber co-founder Garett Camp

Even after stepping down as the company's CEO, Travis Kalanick seems to personify Uber as a company — but Kalanick wasn't the one to come up with the original idea for Uber.

"Garrett [Camp] is the guy who invented that s--t," Kalanick once said at an early Uber event in San Francisco. "I just want to clap and hug him at the same time."

Camp described what we know as "ride-sharing" to Kalanick when they attended the 2008 LeWeb conference: He wanted to create a convenient luxury car service that didn't cost a thousand dollars to use. Kalanick was on board, and UberCab started later that year.

The initial prototype was created by Camp and two of his friends from graduate school. Kalanick was brought on as a "mega advisor," and wasn't even CEO until 2010 when he replaced then-CEO Ryan Graves.

Camp earned his first fortune when he sold the web-recommendation tool StumbleUpon to eBay in 2007; he still serves as chairman for both StumbleUpon and Uber. He's also an investor and creator of startup studio Expa, which helps new founders build their own products.

Camp doesn't seem to be involved with the day-to-day at activities at Uber, although he did publish this blog post in light of all of the negative attention that Uber was getting last year.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The Reason Eduardo Saverin Isn't Listed As One Of Facebook's Top Shareholders

$
0
0

Eduardo Saverin

Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin sold some of his shares to Digital Sky Technologies, according to a new regulatory filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

At last report, Saverin was suspected to own around 5 percent of Facebook. But he was absent from Facebook's S-1 filing with the SEC.

That meant he either sold a part of his shares or they were diluted during an additional fundraising round. The new filing suggests the former.

The filing didn't indicate how many shares he transferred to DST.

via Bloomberg


Join the conversation about this story »

GOODBYE, AMERICA: Billionaire Facebook Cofounder Renounces Citizenship

$
0
0

eduardo saverin

Billionaire Facebook cofounder Eduardo Saverin is renouncing his citizenship ahead of the company's IPO at the end of next week.

Saverin is the cofounder who got booted from the company WAY back in 2005. They made a movie about it.

His 4 percent stake is worth about $4 billion and he's going to save a boatload on taxes with the move.

Singapore, where Saverin lives, does not have a capital gains tax.

He will have to pay an exit tax on his holdings, but it will be at Facebook's valuation now, not after the IPO.

“Eduardo recently found it more practical to become a resident of Singapore since he plans to live there for an indefinite period of time,” Tom Goodman, a spokesman for Saverin, tells Bloomberg's Danielle Kucera, Sanat Vallikappen and Christine Harper.

Mostly, Saverin got in the way of Facebook's early development. At one point, he froze the company's bank account because he wasn't getting enough attention. Still, he was its first outside investor. And for that, insiders have described him as one of the most important people in company history.

Click here to meet some more soon-to-be Facebook millionaires and billionaires >>

Join the conversation about this story »

Facebook's Cofounder Tries To Come Up With A Better Excuse For Renouncing His U.S. Citizenship

$
0
0

eduardo saverin

Eduardo Saverin, the billionaire cofounder of Facebook, outraged many Americans last week when he announced plans to renounce his U.S. citizenship, a move that many assumed was an effort to get out of paying taxes.

Now, Saverin's spokesperson is attempting to pour some water on the fire by arguing that taxes really had nothing to do with this decision. Instead, it's all about freeing up his ability to invest overseas.

“U.S. citizens are severely restricted as to what they can invest in and where they can maintain accounts,” Saverin's spokesman Tom Goodman said, according to the Wall Street Journal. “Many foreign funds and banks won’t accept Americans. This was a financial rather than a tax motive.”

As the Journalnotes, some Americans who hope to live and invest overseas like Saverin do complain about extra red tape resulting from their U.S. citizenship, though thepaper also points out that "people as wealthy  as Mr. Saverin tend to have an easier time untangling red tape than the average U.S. retiree living abroad."

Join the conversation about this story »

Jim Rogers: The Media Is Getting Eduardo Saverin All Wrong — It's Very Expensive To Give Up Your Citizenship

$
0
0

Jim Rogers

Last week it was reported that Eduardo Saverin, co-founder of Facebook, was renouncing his U.S. citizenship ahead of the company's IPO.

But Jim Rogers, chairman of Rogers Holdings, who is a U.S. citizen and moved to Singapore in 2007, said Saverin renounced his citizenship a few months ago:

"The press seemed to say he did it to avoid [taxes], he has to pay taxes. He had to pay huge taxes, hundreds of millions of dollars to give up his citizenship and if it [Facebook] hadn't gone public or if something had gone wrong with the IPO, he would have been in a real bind.

When you give up your American citizenship, it's not fair as far as i'm concerned, but the rules are that you have to pay everything, you have to pay taxes on everything you own and then you can leave. I mean no other country in the world does that, we've got our own Berlin Wall, it's very expensive to leave, to give up your citizenship. Iran, North Korea and Cuba, and some countries it's impossible, very expensive to give up your citizenship."

Rogers moved to Singapore because he wanted his children to grow up fluent in Mandarin, but he said the country is very pro-business and is in the top 3 worldwide for doing business.

He said if people are discouraged with the U.S. should consider moving away but that it was a deeply "personal and difficult choice", and added that there's nothing wrong with it, that "this country was built on people who gave up their citizenship."

Don't Miss: Jim Rogers Identifies The Biggest Mistake China Is Making Right Now >

Join the conversation about this story »

EXCLUSIVE: How Mark Zuckerberg booted his co-founder out of the company

$
0
0

Mark Zuckerberg

Facebook co-founder, Eduardo Saverin, no longer works at Facebook.

He hasn't since 2005, when CEO Mark Zuckerberg diluted Saverin's stake in Facebook and then booted him from the company.

Saverin's exit from Facebook was the central plot of "The Social Network."

Maybe you remember this scene?

 

"The Social Network" is a work of fiction, of course. But it's based on a true story.

This is that story.

This is the story of how Saverin got so angry at Zuckerberg—how, from Saverin's perspective, Zuckerberg screwed him out of a huge chunk of Facebook stock.

It's also the story of how Zuckerberg solved an early problem at Facebook, one that could have potentially prevented the company from becoming the global behemoth it is today.

The story is sourced from people involved in the founding year of Facebook, people close to Facebook, and documents viewed by Business Insider.  It is an update to a previous story of ours, which included previously unpublished emails and instant messages between Mark Zuckerberg and early Facebook colleagues and confidants. This new version includes new material: Previously unpublished email correspondence between Zuckerberg and Facebook's early lawyers.

Eduardo Saverin"A sucker born every day."

In late 2003, Harvard sophomore Mark Zuckerberg asked a Harvard student named Eduardo Saverin, a junior, to deposit $15,000 in a bank account that would be accessible to both of them. The money, Mark promised, would go toward the servers needed to host a site that Mark wanted to develop. The site would be called TheFacebook.com. Eduardo agreed.

Why did Zuckerberg choose Saverin to be his first business partner?

Zuckerberg, Facebook, and Saverin declined interview requests for this story, but we can infer some of Zuckerberg's thinking from instant messages he wrote during the time.

In one IM to a friend, Zuckerberg described his new partner, Saverin, as the "head of the investment society." Saverin was rich, Zuckerberg went on to say, because "apparently insider trading isn't illegal in Brazil." 

Zuckerberg also partnered with Saverin because Saverin gave the impression he knew something about business. Saverin was the kind of guy who wore suits to class at Harvard, and he left people—including Zuckerberg—with the impression that he was connected to the Brazilian mafia.

In another IM conversation, this one from January 8, 2004, Mark described the arrangement this way:

Zuckerberg: Eduardo is paying for my servers.

Friend: A sucker born every day.

Zuckerberg: Nah, he thinks it will make money.

Friend: What do you think?

Zuckerberg: Well I don't know business stuff

Zuckerberg: I'm content to make something cool.

So Zuckerberg appears to have approached Saverin because Saverin had money and a vision for how to make more of it. Zuckerberg, meanwhile, wanted to "make something cool."

With Saverin's money paying for the servers, TheFacebook.com went live in February 2004. It was an instant sensation at Harvard. Students from other schools quickly clamored for the site's expansion, and Mark and his colleagues obliged.

By April, the site was doing so well that Zuckerberg, Saverin, and a third Harvard sophomore named Dustin Muskovitz formed The Facebook as a limited-liability company (LLC) under Florida law.  Two months later, on June 10, 2004, a Harvard commencement speaker mentioned the amazing popularity of thefacebook.com. 

It was the high point in the relationship between the cofounders. Things quickly went south from there.


Eduardo Saverin"I maintain that he fucked himself"

Six months after thefacebook.com launched, as the summer of 2004 began, Zuckerberg and Moskovitz moved to Palo Alto, California where they planned to work on TheFacebook.com in a rented house. Saverin went to New York for an internship at Lehman Brothers.

According to instant messages from this period, before Zuckerberg left for the West Coast, he asked Saverin to work on three things: "to set up the company, get funding, and make a business model."

Almost immediately after the move, the relationship between cofounders began to fray.

At first, it was just a cultural divide. One awkward IM exchange reveals how different Zuckerberg's life in Palo Alto was compared to Saverin's life back on the East Coast:

Saverin: So you guys go out a lot to partiens [sic] and such there?

Zuckerberg: But in general we don't do fun things.

Zuckerberg: But that's OK because the business is fun.

Saverin: Lol yeah it is fun. No fun things though?

Zuckerberg: Eh, enough.

But then Saverin did something that really pissed Zuckerberg off: He ran unauthorized ads on Facebook.

Worse, the ads were for a startup Saverin was running entirely on his own, a job boards site called Joboozle.

Zuckerberg blasted Saverin for this in an email:

You developed Joboozle knowing that at some point Facebook would probably want to do something with jobs. This was pretty surprising to us, because you basically made something on the side that will end up competing with Facebook and that's pretty bad by itself. But putting ads up on Facebook to advertise it, especially for free, is just mean.

What finally ruined the relationship between Saverin and Zuckerberg for good was Facebook's need for funding.

As that first summer went on and TheFacebook.com grew more popular than anyone imagined, the company needed money to keep running. Finding investors wasn't hard. As early as July, Silicon Valley bigwigs like Mark Pincus, Reid Hoffman, and Peter Thiel were lining up to give Mark cash. Things were going so well, in fact, that Mark soon decided to commit to the company and not return to Harvard for his junior year.

What was hard, however, was getting Facebook co-founder Saverin's attention, getting him to make a decision, and getting him to sign off on the reformation of Facebook as a company under Delaware law —a crucial step before any funding deals could be completed.

At one point, Zuckerberg emailed Saverin to offer him frequent flyer miles if it would get him out to Palo Alto. Saverin didn't take the offer. The situation soon became critical, because without financing, TheFacebook.com would end up running on Zuckerberg family loans.

Eventually, Zuckerberg decided to solve the problem by cutting Saverin out of the company.

In an IM with Moskovitz, Zuckerberg explained why:

I maintain that he fucked himself…He was supposed to set up the company, get funding, and make a business model. He failed at all three…Now that I'm not going back to Harvard I don't need to worry about getting beaten by Brazilian thugs.

sean parker"I'm just going to cut him out."

When Zuckerberg and Moskovitz moved out to Palo Alto in June 2004, they ran into Sean Parker, an Internet startup kid best known for cofounding Napster. Parker soon joined TheFacebook.com.

Parker's first task was to do one of things Saverin was supposed to do, but hadn't yet: help Facebook find money.  Parker had raised money for Napster and he knew his way around Silicon Valley. He quickly proved himself capable. For Zuckerberg, this only reinforced the idea that Saverin was expendable.

The only problem was: How would Zuckerberg cut Facebook's third-biggest stakeholder and co-founder out of the company?

In an IM exchange with Parker after a meeting with Peter Thiel, who would soon become Facebook's first outside investor, Mark and Sean discussed the Saverin problem. Zuckerberg hinted at a hardball solution, one based on some "dirty tricks" used by Peter Thiel.

Thiel had learned these tricks, Parker said, from one of the most legendary venture capitalists in the Valley, Michael Moritz of Sequoia. Sequoia has funded Google, Yahoo, PayPal, Zappos, and many other massive tech companies.

Parker: Peter [Thiel] tried some dirty tricks. All that shit he does is like classic Moritz shit.

Zuckerberg: Haha really?

Parker: Only Moritz does it way better.

Zuckerberg: That's weak.

Parker: I bet he learned that from Mike.

Zuckerberg: Well, now I learned it from him and I'll do it to Eduardo.

In later emails and IMs, we learn what "dirty tricks" Zuckerberg intended to pull to get TheFacebook.com funding without having to wait for sign-off from Saverin.

His plan: Reduce Saverin's stake in TheFacebook.com by creating a new company, a Delaware corporation, to acquire the old company (the Florida LLC formed in April), and then distribute new shares in the new company to everybody but Saverin. Mark discussed this plan with confidants over IM several times.

Here's one instance:

Confidant: How are you going to get around Eduardo?

Zuckerberg: I'm going to buy the LLC

Zuckerberg: And then give him less shares in the company that bought it

Confidant: I'm not sure it's worth a potential lawsuit just to redistribute shares. You have nothing to gain.

Zuckerberg: No I do because until I do this I need to run everything by Eduardo. After this I have control

In another, Mark writes:

"Eduardo is refusing to co-operate at all…We basically now need to sign over our intellectual property to a new company and just take the lawsuit…I'm just going to cut him out and then settle with him. And he'll get something I'm sure, but he deserves something…He has to sign stuff for investments and he's lagging and I can't take the lag."

Zuckerberg pulled the trigger, sending an email to his lawyer telling him to put the plan into effect.

In this previously unpublished email, Zuckerberg writes of Saverin: "Is there a way to do this without making it painfully apparent to him that he's being diluted to 10%?"

In response, Zuckerberg's lawyer issues a prescient warning:

"As Eduardo is the only shareholder being diluted by the grants issuances there is substantial risk that he may claim the issuances, especially the ones to Dustin and Mark, but also to Sean, are a breach of fiduciary duty later on if not now. "


The plan works

In the middle of that summer, Zuckerberg's plan to oust his cofounder went off without a hitch.

On July 29, 2004, the new company, TheFacebook.com was incorporated in Delaware. Then it acquired the old company, formed back in April as an LLC in Florida.

On September 27, 2004, Peter Thiel formally acquired 9% of the new company with a convertible note worth $500,000. Before the transaction, Facebook ownership was divided between Zuckerberg, with 65%, Saverin, with 30%, and Moskovitz, with 5%. After the transaction, the new company was divided between Zuckerberg, with 40%, Saverin, with 24%, Moskovitz, with 16%, and Thiel with 9%. The rest, about 20%, went to an options pool for future employees. From there, a good chunk of equity went to Eduardo's replacement, TheFacebook.com's new COO, Sean Parker.

On October 31, 2004, Saverin signed a shareholder agreement that alloted him 3 million shares of common stock in the new company. In the agreement, he handed over all relevant intellectual property and turned over his voting rights to Mark Zuckerberg. Zuckerberg became Facebook's sole director.

On January 7, 2005, Zuckerberg caused Facebook to issue 9 million shares of common stock in the new company. He took 3.3. million shares for himself and gave 2 million to Sean Parker and 2 million to Dustin Moskovitz. This share issuance instantly diluted Saverin's stake in the company from ~24% to below 10%. 

Mark's plan had succeeded. Eduardo was, for all intents and purposes, gone.

Bringing down the house

In a testament to how little Saverin was involved in Facebook's operations after Zuckerberg left Harvard, Saverin apparently only found out how badly he'd been diluted in April 2005, when TheFacebook.com sent him a letter seeking approval for its second formal round of funding.

Fifteen days after that letter was sent from TheFacebook.com's HQ, one came back from Eduardo's lawyers. The next day, Zuckerberg finally fired Saverin.

It was this moment in history that "The Social Network" attempted to capture in the scene we embedded at the start of this story.

The lawsuits predictably followed. 

First, Facebook filed a lawsuit against Saverin, arguing that the stock-purchase agreements he had signed in October were invalid. Then Saverin sued Zuckerberg, alleging he spent Facebook's money (his money) on personal expenses over the summer.

The jilted Saverin grew bitter. At one point, he reached out to Cameron Winklevoss, Tyler Winklevoss, and Divvya Narendra – the Harvard students who allege that Mark Zuckerberg stole their idea for the company in the first place.

Eventually, sources say, Saverin decided to attack Zuckerberg's reputation.

He approached Ben Mezrich—the author of Bringing Down The House, a book about how a group of MIT students made it big in Vegas—and offered him a book about how a group of Harvard students made it big in Silicon Valley.  Bringing Down The House makes its characters out to be rock stars and scoundrels; the Facebook book, Accidental Billionaires, does the same.

Then in 2010, Columbia Pictures made a movie based on the book. It features cocaine, models, and dark, moody, lighting from David Fincher, the director who brought you "Fight Club."  It's a good flick. Because of its source material, it makes Saverin into more of a victim than he really was.

After Saverin began talking to Mezrich, he and Facebook settled their lawsuits.  Facebook went from officially denying Saverin's status as a cofounder to listing him as one on its Web site. As a part of the settlement, Saverin stopped talking to the press.

Like the Winklevoss brothers, Eduardo Saverin clearly felt he got screwed by Mark Zuckerberg in Facebook's early days, and in one way, he did.

We can tell from the previously unpublished letter included in this story that Zuckerberg didn't really want Saverin to notice his stake in Facebook was being diluted.

But also like the Winklevosses, Saverin won huge in the end. Thanks to Zuckerberg and the rest of the Facebook team, most of Saverin's $10 billion wealth still comes from his little $15,000 investment, with no further effort from himself.

Having renounced his US citizenship to avoid paying a boatload of taxes on his Facebook wealth, Saverin now resides in Singapore.

Join the conversation about this story »

EXCLUSIVE: Here's The Email Zuckerberg Sent To Cut His Cofounder Out Of Facebook

$
0
0

Billionaire Facebook cofounder Eduardo Saverinthe guy everyone now hates because he's renouncing his US citizenship in order to avoid a lot of taxes– hasn't worked at Facebook since 2005. That's when CEO Mark Zuckerberg diluted his stake and then booted him from the company.

Saverin's exit from Facebook was the central plot of The Social Network.

Maybe you remember this scene?

 

Today we have a long, detailed re-telling of the true story behind the movie.

The basics: Saverin was tasked with running Facebook's business side while Zuckerberg worked on the product. But instead of joining the company out in Palo Alto, Saverin stayed on the East coast and worked on another startup. Eventually, he started to feel left out, and he froze Facebook's bank account. 

To ease Saverin out and limit his say over how Facebook would be funded, Zuckerberg reduced Saverin's stake in the company.

Zuckerberg did this by creating a new company to acquire the old company and then distribute new shares in the new company to everybody but Saverin.

Well now, thanks to a well-placed source, we've come up with something cool.

It's the email then 20-year-old Mark Zuckerberg sent his lawyer giving him the go ahead to draft paperwork that would result in Saverin's dilution. 

We love the email because it's an artifact of a young Mark Zuckerberg – a man who has grown up a lot since he wrote it, and will be in our lives for a very long time.

The fun part is where Zuckerberg says to his lawyer: "Is there a way to do this without making it painfully apparent to him that he's being diluted to 10%?"

The full letter:

[Redacted],

This email should probably be attorney-client privileged, not quite how to do that though.

Anyhow, Sean and I have agreed that a price of one-half cent per share is the way to go for now. We think we can maybe almost justify and if not, we'll just deal with it later.

We also agreed that if the company bonusing us the amount we need for the shares, plus tax, is a good solution to the problem of us all being completely broke.

As far as Eduardo goes, I think it's safe to ask for his permission to make grants. Especially if we do it in conjunction with raising money. It's probably even OK to say how many shares we're adding to the pool. It's probably less OK to tell him who's getting the shares, just because he might have adverse reaction initially. But I think we may even be able to make him understand that.

Is there a way to do this without making it painfully apparent to him that he's being diluted to 10%?

OK, that's all for now. I'll send you the list of grants I need made in another email in a second. Sean can send you grants for his people when he stops coughing up his lungs.

Hope you guys both feel better,
Mark

And here's part of the lawyer's response:

…I spent some time discussing the risks associated with making these grants and picking the per share price of common stock. Mark, you and I should discuss these at length to insure that you understand them. I've outlined them below for your easy reference.

The broad categories of legal risk are a) fiduciary duty. As Eduardo is the only shareholder being diluted by the grants issuances there is substantial risk that he may claim the issuances, especially the ones to Dustin and Mark, but also to Sean, are a breach of fiduciary duty later on if not now. I believe that you previously disclosed these future dilutative issuances to Eduardo before the LLC merger. This is what I recommended at the time. Nevertheless, it would be great if there is some way you could obtain a shareholder consent from Eduardo approving these new issuances. It isn't *required* but it would be very advantageous and would go a very long way towards preventing any future claims he might have for breach of fiduciary duty. I mentioned this to Sean and he was going to give it some thought.

In the end, the lawyer was right to worry. 

Saverin eventually sued Facebook over breach of fiduciary duty. Facebook and Saverin settled, and he walked away with 4% or 5% of the company. That stake is now worth close to $5 billion.

Meanwhile, Facebook has done pretty well with Zuckerberg running the show with sole authority.

Eight years after its creation, Facebook will raise $15 billion in an IPO this Friday that will value the company at somewhere around $100 billion.

Join the conversation about this story »

AMERICA, ASCHMERICA: Billionaire Facebook Cofounder Saves $67 Million Renouncing Citizenship

$
0
0

Eduardo Saverin close-up

When we learned that Facebook cofounder Eduardo Saverin renounced his US citizenship, we assumed it might have something to do with avoiding US taxes.

His stake is worth $4 billion to $5 billion, and even a small percentage of that amount can really add up.

Turns out we were on to something.

Taking a low estimate of Saverin's stake – valuing it at $3 billion – Bloomberg's Jesse Drucker concludes that Saverin will save at least $67 million giving up on the red, white, and blue.

Drucker:

Bloomberg calculated the $67 million figure by applying the 15 percent U.S. capital gains rate to the approximate $448 million spread between the two values. Bloomberg’s methodology was reviewed by Robert Willens, an independent tax adviser based in New York…

…His savings may be even greater because Saverin’s tax advisers could argue that the value of his stake in September was less than the $2.44 billion used in Bloomberg’s calculation because selling such a large amount of stock at the then-market price wasn’t possible.

Saverin's spokesperson insists that the tax savings are not his motivation.

“The calculations and assumptions are not only erroneous, they also further perpetuate the false impression that tax was the reason behind Eduardo’s decision,” this spokesperson told Bloomberg.

“His motive had nothing to do with tax and everything to do with his desire to live and work in Singapore.”

Related: EXCLUSIVE: Here's The Email Zuckerberg Sent To Cut His Cofounder Out Of Facebook

Join the conversation about this story »


Expat Facebook Cofounder Eduardo Saverin Has A Bentley And Doesn't Know How To Spend His IPO Billions

$
0
0

Eduardo Saverin

Facebook cofounder Eduardo Saverin, recently making headlines for exiting the United States by renouncing his citizenship, is apparently living quite the life in Singapore.

A new profile in the New York Time has a lot of interesting details about the new billionaire's playboy lifestyle. He's apparently so rich that he doesn't even know how to spend his money:

Thanks to the interconnected world Mr. Saverin helped to create, the Internet is full of people sharing photos and stories of him embraced by statuesque women and drinking expensive Champagne. “It’s a misperception, especially the playboy,” he said. “I do have a Bentley. I do go out. I’d rather not go into personal details.”

...As for himself, good advice for the single young billionaire is harder to find. He said he had spoken with a number of people with tremendous wealth, “but every experience is unique. Certainly there has been no one who was a college kid, and got it this fast.”

“What does this enable me to do? What am I provided with to help?” he asked. “Right now, I don’t know how to deploy the capital and the blessings.”

As for Facebook's upcoming IPO on Friday, Saverin told the New York Times he would watch the IPO quietly with a few friends in Singapore—which would happen in the middle of the night.

Join the conversation about this story »

These Senators Are Going After Facebook Cofounder Eduardo Saverin For Trying To Avoid A $67 Million Tax Bill

$
0
0

Schumer 400x300

Eduardo Saverin, co-founder of Facebook, is saving at least 67 million in tax dollars by renouncing his U.S. citizenship.

Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Bob Casey (D-PA) aren't happy about that.

The two Senators will introduce the "Ex-PATRIOT Act" to punish ex-citizens who ditch the U.S. for lower tax rates.

It's short for "Expatriation Prevention by Abolishing Tax-Related Incentives for Offshore Tenancy."

Current law would already bar Saverin from reentering the country if it's determined that he left for tax-related reasons.

But Schumer and Casey want to improve the law by imposing a new capital gains tax on wealthy individuals like Saverin who renounce citizenship and move to tax havens. If the expats don't pay, they can't come back.

They made it very clear the legislation is about Saverin.

“Mr. Saverin has decided to ‘defriend’ the United States of America just to avoid paying his taxes. We aren’t going to let him get away with it so easily,” Schumer said in a statement.

Saverin's spokesman said last weekend it's not about the taxes, it's about finances.

To renounce his citizenship, Saverin had to pay an "exit tax," which let the government collect some of the taxes he would have paid if he stayed, he told the New York Times.

Saverin now lives in Singapore, where the capital gains tax is... 0%.

"It’s infuriating to see someone sell out the country that welcomed him and kept him safe, educated him and helped him become a billionaire," Schumer said in a release. "This is a great American success story gone horribly wrong. We plan to put a stop to this tax avoidance scheme. There should be no financial gain from renouncing your country."

The most surprising thing about the legislation is that it targets anyone with a net worth above $2 million or an average income tax liability of at least $148,000 in the past five years. Expats who meet either criterion "will be presumed to have renounced their citizenship for tax avoidance purposes."

These expats will get the chance to prove to the IRS they have other reasons to expatriate, but the IRS has the final say.

Senator Casey couched the legislation in Occupy terms: ”We simply cannot allow the ultra-wealthy to write their own rules.”

In the meantime, Saverin, who told the New York Times that he fancies himself a "global citizen," will keep raging in Singapore.

Join the conversation about this story »

AMERICA WINS: Facebook Co-Founder Eduardo Saverin Will Pay His Taxes (AAPL)

$
0
0

eduardo saverin

Eduardo Saverin, co-founder of Facebook, could have saved at least $67 million by renouncing his U.S. citizenship and moving to Singapore, where the capital gains tax is 0%.

According to CNN's Dana Bash, Saverin might pay those taxes after all. "He intends to pay all taxes he owes on us investments, despite renouncing us citizenship," she tweeted.

Earlier today, senators Chuck Schumer and Bob Casey announced legislation that would impose a 30% capital gains tax on expats who leave the country for lower tax rates on investments. The senators mentioned Saverin by name in their press conference.

Looks like it worked! America wins!

Join the conversation about this story »

The Government Wanted To Rewrite The Expat Tax Code And Now It Has The Perfect Excuse

$
0
0

eduardo saverin

May 22, 2012
Los Angeles, USA

This week, the universally stupid brainchild of US Senators Chuck Schumer and Bob Casey known as the Ex-PATRIOT Act inched a bit closer towards becoming law.

‘Ex-PATRIOT’ is an absurd acronym that stands for “Expatriation Prevention by Abolishing Tax-Related Incentives for Offshore Tenancy”. I call it the Tax Slave Act… and it proposes three key provisions:

1) Individuals who are deemed, in the sole discretion of the US government, to have renounced US citizenship in order to avoid US taxes, will be permanently barred from re-entering the United States.

2) Such individuals will also be required to pay a 30% capital gains tax to the United States government on ALL future investment gains derived from the US. Currently, non-citizens who do not reside in the US pay no US capital gains tax.

3) These proposals are RETROACTIVE, and, if passed, would apply to anyone who renounced his/her citizenship within the last 10-years.

During a Sunday interview with ABC News, House Speaker John Boehner threw his support behind the bill… certainly a big step towards its eventual passage.

Let’s pause briefly for a little history lesson–

Dart Container Corporation was founded in 1960 by William F. Dart, the man who first perfected the design of styrofoam. Dart Container is today a multi-billion dollar family-owned company with thousands of employees and operations around the world.

In the early 1990s, brothers Kenneth and Robert Dart, heirs to the family fortune, renounced their US citizenship and became citizens of Belize and Ireland, and set up residency in the Cayman Islands.

Around the same time, several other wealthy Americans renounced citizenship, including Carnival Cruise Lines founder Ted Arison (who obtained Israeli citizenship), Campbell Soup heir John Dorrance (Irish citizenship), and fund manager Mark Mobius (German citizenship).

President Clinton was furious, and in 1996, he pushed Congress to pass a series of financial penalties for people who renounce citizenship. At the time, a ‘renunciant’ had to continue filing US tax returns for 10-years after renouncing.

Effectively, though, this penalty was a tax on worldwide income, not an exit tax on assets.

Fast forward to the mid-2000s, a time when the asset bubble was at its peak; the stock market was at its all-time high and real estate prices kept going up.

The Bush regime passed a series of changes to expatriation rules, dropping the income tax filing requirements in lieu of charging a one-time exit tax on assets.

In this way, the government was able to derive a much larger payment up front based on total assets rather than chasing around a former citizen for a piece of annual income.

In the years since the exit tax on assets was established, two things have happened:

1) The number of Americans renouncing US citizenship has risen steadily, from 235 people in 2008 to 1,780 last year (according to Schumer’s office).

2) The asset bubble has burst, and assets are worth much less than just a few years ago. As such, the government isn’t collecting as much revenue from the exit tax.

My sense is that the government has been watching the number of expatriates rise over the years, and simultaneously watching the value of the exit tax fall… and they’ve been looking for an excuse to make sweeping (i.e. retroactive) changes.

Eduardo Saverin is the perfect excuse. The Facebook co-founder’s recent renunciation of US citizenship has become a rallying cry for politicians to go back in time and steal money from former citizens retroactively…plus establish a larger base for future tax revenues.

This is a truly despicable thing to do considering that these former citizens followed the appropriate rules at the time, paid the tax, and moved on with their lives. Now Uncle Sam wants to go back in time to unilaterally change the deal, and expect everyone to abide even though they’re not even citizens anymore. The arrogance is overwhelming.

More importantly, this bill is also a major deterrent for people who are thinking about renouncing US citizenship today.

The passage of this law will undoubtedly cause many people who were considering expatriation to abandon the idea altogether as the thought of being permanently barred from entry is too much to bear.

It’s truly extraordinary that the Land of the Free has deteriorated to the point that the government must now resort to threats, coercion, and intimidation in order to keep its most productive citizens inside.

Read more posts on Sovereign Man »

Join the conversation about this story »

Facebook's Cofounder Forgives Zuckerberg: "I Have Only Good Things To Say About Mark"

$
0
0

eduardo saverin

Facebook's co-founder Eduardo Saverin really wants the world to know that he doesn't hold a grudge against Mark Zuckerberg for being pushed out of the company in its early days. In fact, he thinks Zuckerberg is a visionary.

"I have only good things to say about Mark, there are no hard feelings between us," Saverin said in an extensive interview this weekend with Veja, a Brazilian publication (translation via Forbes). "He was a visionary, he always knew that the only way to get Facebook to grow was to maintain its central idea, that of people truly presenting themselves as they are, without nicknames or pseudonyms."

Saverin released a similar statement earlier this month, writing a note on Zuckerberg's Facebook wall to congratulate him on the success of the company on the eve of the IPO.

Saverin certainly has plenty of reason to be upset at Zuckerberg, who was responsible for diluting his stake in Facebook and ultimately booting him from the company in 2005, but Saverin claims to be over it. This probably comes as a shock to anyone who has seen The Social Network and watched the fallout between Saverin and Zuckerberg unfold on the big screen.

However, in the interview, Saverin dismisses the portrayal of Facebook in the movie as "fantasy" and suggests that it exaggerated the tension between him and Zuckerberg.

"I would never throw a laptop at someone, like it appears in the movie," he said. "Not even at Mark."

Join the conversation about this story »

Viewing all 56 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>